 |
|












 |
macosx
timtad | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I have to say that I am terribly disappointed with Apple. After having what was a remarkably reliable 2002 Quicksilver G4 which finally became unstable and died in late 2010 and I held off getting a new Mac, first because there were multiple other Macs in the house, and then because i knew a mini refresh was coming. The mini refresh included Lion.
Right out of the box things looked okay, but I was preoccupied with migrating my last viable backups from 10.5 to 10.7 and the first thing I discovered was Migration Assistant would only work one revision backward, so I had a brand new system I could not migrate to, after being told by Apple store staff that that would not be an issue. So I order Snow Leopard, which would not run not the quicksilver, or any other available machine in my house. Instead I wind up having to recover individual files ( such as my contacts list from Address Book, by exporting them from a cloned version of my old system and importing them into lion) all while fighting random crashes, Spinning Beach Balls Of Death (SBBOD), where the machine required rebooting to escape the locked cursor, and cases where all input simply stopped responding.
It finally got to the point where the time until a freeze was so predictable that took it to the Apple Store in desperation and (thank science), it failed repeatedly on the test bench. Diagnosas, bad logic board. So after a week, where I never spoke to the same employee twice, I was told that they were actually replacing the whole machine, but I had to bring in my time machine backups (which have multiple users on the same disk). I had to ask for a receipt. The next day I was called to pickup the newly imaged machine and was told they got the data off the mini itself,and had not needed the TM backups. Unfortunately the machine they gave me did not have the same HD configuration as the one I had bought on my original CTO. They had to take the machine back, swap drives and reimage again! They had not even looked at the configuration and apparently their internal systems reported a different configuration for the part number assigned to my machine than what I had actually ordered and had shipped. (A big plus for the Apple Tech who actually fixed this, otherwise going to the store in King of Prussia, PA was like going onto the trading floor of the stock exchange, loud, crowded & chaotic).
Now I could finally discover the disappointment that is Lion. If I had not bought a machine with Lion already on it, I would be wiping it and reinstalling Snow Leopard. More, See comment-
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

















 |
macosx
xiaomi | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I'll be going back to school in the fall and, likely next weekend, will be replacing my Nov. 2007 MB with a MBP. For a few reasons, I don't really think the MB product line is right for me this time - I use a wheelchair, and I know from my June 2004 white iBook that a white MB will look like it went through a brushfire after a few months of transfer of dirt from floor->wheelchair->hands-computer. On top of that, I have poor vision and finicky eyes - I tend to use my MB in dim rooms a lot on account of that, and would *love* the backlit keyboard so that I don't have to use the computer's screen as an impromptu flashlight on the keyboard. Having said that, I'm very torn between the 2.3ghz and 2.7ghz. I'll be mostly doing work in Pages or MS Word (I'm going to try to avoid having to get MS Office through use of iWork and Open Office. I also anticipate reluctantly purchasing the student version of Adobe Acrobat, as attorneys work with more and more PDF files lately and, due to my disabilities, my handwriting is extremely poor - I'm willing to buy Acrobat's student version to access typewriter so that I can edit/add text to PDF files as necessary, and expect to be using that feature often, particularly as I get closer to returning to practice. I'm not a huge gamer, but I may play with some SimCity/Civilization-style games if the computer can tolerate it. I'm a heavy iTunes user and I have a very full iPhoto; if the computer can tolerate it, I'd probably like to use it more for watching video than the current one is able. So, basically, anyone have thoughts between the 2.3ghz and the 2.7ghz? I know some people like upgrading to the solid state HD, but I'm already using 140GB on this one, it'd take a huge chunk of change to upgrade even the 2.3ghz to a large enough solid state HD, an amount that's hard to justify - I'm basically down to only one choice - 2.3 or 2.7. Having said that, I want to do this right, I don't want to regret my purchase two years from now. Secondly, any thoughts on if I'll be able to squeak by with just iWork, or do I need to get MS Office as well? Thank you :). Current Location: Phoenix, AZ Current Mood: curious Current Music: 西野カナ - Wishing (Thank you, Love)
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |







 |
macosx
danakm | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I don't know if they're related... but I'm worried, so here's the list: 1) I do a Verify Permissions Check more or less weekly and EVERY SINGLE TIME a repair is needed. I don't remember this happening on my old PowerBook G4, so is this normal on MacBook Pros? 2) About every two/three weeks when I do a Verify Disk check it needs to be repaired from the install DVD. 3) Since January this year, already TWICE has my mac turned off on its own and when restarted it would have changed the date to ~ten years ago O.o It happened for the second time this morning. 4) I have CheckUp installed, so I ran a test some hours ago to see if I got any clues as to what the heck is wrong and got this message: "Smart Crash Reports Input Managers Detected. This technology is no longer supported and can make your system unstable". I have no idea what that means or what to do about it. 5) Reboot time is quite slow. I find myself doing other stuff while the mac starts up. This is fairly new for me :/ 6) As of lately (a couple of months?), my dock icons have been bouncing for much longer when I launch applications. My system profile is this: MacBook Pro 15" (model 5,3) 2.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 4GB 1067 Mhz DDR3 OS X 10.6.7 And here is a copy of the report Disk Utility gave me: clickI don't know if I'm more worried or appalled as this computer is about a year old and my last mac lasted me five good years :( Thank you in advance for any help! (x-posted to macintosh) Current Mood: distressed
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



 |
macosx
dandelion | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I have a drive with three data partitions: a HFS+ one for OSX, an ext2 one for Ubuntu, and a FAT32 one for XP. Everything I've read on the internet says that you cannot backup non-HFS+ formatted volumes with Time Machine. When I view my Time Machine backups, the only partition which appears as viewable is the HFS+ one; the rest are greyed out in the Finder sidebar.
However, when I go into the dialog box where it says what the backup will exclude (eg the backup disk itself, any USB sticks I've plugged in, etc), it doesn't list my XP partition as excluded, and the size it gives for the files being included is 65.0GB. My HFS+ only has 48.79GB of files, according to Finder...so what else is being included? If you add the files on my XP partition to that total, you get 65.04GB - but they don't seem to be in the Time Machine backup, because I can't find known files by searching.
Is the dialog box wrong in how much it thinks it's including, or is Time Machine actually backing up my FAT32 partition somehow?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |



 |
macosx
xv | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
This is verbatim from Apple PR circa 2003: Home away from home Ever thought you could carry your home in the palm of your hands or in your pocket? You can. Panther's Home on iPod feature lets you store your home directory - files, folders, apps - on your iPod (or any FireWire hard drive) and take it with you wherever you go. When you find yourself near a Panther-equipped Mac, just plug in the iPod, log in, and you're "home," no matter where you happen to be. And when you return to your home computer, you can synchronize any changes you've made to your files by using File Sync, which automatically updates offline changes to your home directory. I'm pretty sure Apple never implemented this feature, but I still think it's a good idea. Does anybody know if anyone ever tried to make it happen in 3rd party software? Or if it was something the UNIX community managed to pull off? I like the idea of carrying some user preferences with me, not necessarily the whole user directory, but just something that could quickly flip some switches on, say, a guest account, and have me on my way.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

 |
macosx
xiaomi | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I'm potentially in the market for a new MacBook, as my current Nov. 2007 MacBook is maybe about to bite the dust, it seems (it's presently being assessed for a post-AppleCare repair which may or may not make financial sense, depending on what comes back). So I'm looking at either buying a MacBook or a MacBook Pro. Except for a backlit keyboard, I'm unable to determine the difference between being either: 1) A base-model MacBook Pro out of the box for $1,200. 2) A MacBook with an additional RAM for $1,100. (all links to the Apple Store's website on specs) The other specs (video card, hard drive, processor) seem to be identical, leaving the only difference to be the backlit keyboard. Why should I pay $1,200 ($100 more) for a MacBook Pro when I could build the same thing on a regular MacBook for $1,100? I'm not trying to be argumentative, I've always wanted to upgrade to the Pro line, but I'm not really seeing the value in the base-model MacBook Pro right now - is there something I'm missing? Is the MacBook Pro better built? I've always liked the idea of a backlit keyboard due to my poor eyesight, but will it die in short order? Thanks for the help :) Current Mood: curious
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


|
 |
|
 |